<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Texas Holdem SEO</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pokerseo.org/blog/poker-content/texas-holdem-seo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pokerseo.org/blog/poker-content/texas-holdem-seo/</link>
	<description>Poker SEO &#38; Link Building Strategy, Tactics and Techniques</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 22:15:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: How to Think Outside of the Box</title>
		<link>http://www.pokerseo.org/blog/poker-content/texas-holdem-seo/comment-page-1/#comment-1228</link>
		<dc:creator>How to Think Outside of the Box</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 15:12:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pokerseo.org/blog/?p=212#comment-1228</guid>
		<description>[...] tells you to avoid targeting super competitive phrases like &#8220;online poker&#8221; or &#8220;texas holdem&#8220;, ignore her and compete for those phrases anyway. If someone tells you not to trade links [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] tells you to avoid targeting super competitive phrases like &#8220;online poker&#8221; or &#8220;texas holdem&#8220;, ignore her and compete for those phrases anyway. If someone tells you not to trade links [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg</title>
		<link>http://www.pokerseo.org/blog/poker-content/texas-holdem-seo/comment-page-1/#comment-1204</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 10:52:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pokerseo.org/blog/?p=212#comment-1204</guid>
		<description>Thanks Randy, much appreciated. The point about the frequency of the different natural link anchors reflecting the search terms is so logical.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Randy, much appreciated. The point about the frequency of the different natural link anchors reflecting the search terms is so logical.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy Ray</title>
		<link>http://www.pokerseo.org/blog/poker-content/texas-holdem-seo/comment-page-1/#comment-1195</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy Ray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 00:50:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pokerseo.org/blog/?p=212#comment-1195</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m sure Google has some understanding related to variations of certain phrases. For example, if you do a search for &quot;Texas hold&#039;em&quot;, you&#039;ll notice that &quot;Texas holdem&quot; is bolded in the title tag and description for some of the pages. That being said, I think it would be natural to see those same variations in your anchor text. If 35% of the people on the Internet spell &quot;Texas holdem&quot; when they&#039;re doing a search, and 50% of them search for &quot;Texas hold em&quot;, and 15% search for &quot;Texas hold&#039;em&quot;, then if you were programming the search engine, you&#039;d expect natural link anchor text to reflect similar percentages.

I don&#039;t spend a lot of time trying to get other people to link to me with the anchor text that I want though. I always just ask them to link to me with whatever anchor text THEY think is appropriate. That way I&#039;m not involved in the anchor text decisions, and I never have to worry about an unnatural backlink profile. (i.e. my anchor text profile IS natural, because I let the owners of the sites choose it.)

So no, I don&#039;t think you&#039;d see poorer results across the board. I think you&#039;ll get partial credit for all 3 variations no matter which variation gets used.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sure Google has some understanding related to variations of certain phrases. For example, if you do a search for &#8220;Texas hold&#8217;em&#8221;, you&#8217;ll notice that &#8220;Texas holdem&#8221; is bolded in the title tag and description for some of the pages. That being said, I think it would be natural to see those same variations in your anchor text. If 35% of the people on the Internet spell &#8220;Texas holdem&#8221; when they&#8217;re doing a search, and 50% of them search for &#8220;Texas hold em&#8221;, and 15% search for &#8220;Texas hold&#8217;em&#8221;, then if you were programming the search engine, you&#8217;d expect natural link anchor text to reflect similar percentages.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t spend a lot of time trying to get other people to link to me with the anchor text that I want though. I always just ask them to link to me with whatever anchor text THEY think is appropriate. That way I&#8217;m not involved in the anchor text decisions, and I never have to worry about an unnatural backlink profile. (i.e. my anchor text profile IS natural, because I let the owners of the sites choose it.)</p>
<p>So no, I don&#8217;t think you&#8217;d see poorer results across the board. I think you&#8217;ll get partial credit for all 3 variations no matter which variation gets used.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg</title>
		<link>http://www.pokerseo.org/blog/poker-content/texas-holdem-seo/comment-page-1/#comment-1193</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 23:13:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pokerseo.org/blog/?p=212#comment-1193</guid>
		<description>Randy, if you attempted to rank for [Texas Holdem], do you think that you would inadvertently end up ranking for the other possible searched variants like [Texas Hold em] and [Texas Hold&#039;em]?

If not, do you think that including variants of the term in your text and varying your incoming links (where possible) would allow you to rank for all 3 terms? This is after putting in the equal amount of effort it would take to rank for just the one?

So (hypothetically speaking), instead of getting 100 links with &quot;Texas Holdem&quot; in there somewhere, mixing up you text and getting 33 with &quot;Texas Holdem&quot;, 33 with &quot;Texas Hold em&quot; and 34 with &quot;Texas Hold&#039;em&quot;. Do you think you would see poorer results across the board than if you just focused on the one variant?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Randy, if you attempted to rank for [Texas Holdem], do you think that you would inadvertently end up ranking for the other possible searched variants like [Texas Hold em] and [Texas Hold'em]?</p>
<p>If not, do you think that including variants of the term in your text and varying your incoming links (where possible) would allow you to rank for all 3 terms? This is after putting in the equal amount of effort it would take to rank for just the one?</p>
<p>So (hypothetically speaking), instead of getting 100 links with &#8220;Texas Holdem&#8221; in there somewhere, mixing up you text and getting 33 with &#8220;Texas Holdem&#8221;, 33 with &#8220;Texas Hold em&#8221; and 34 with &#8220;Texas Hold&#8217;em&#8221;. Do you think you would see poorer results across the board than if you just focused on the one variant?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

