<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Rewriting the Same Article Over &amp; Over Again is a Waste of Time</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pokerseo.org/blog/poker-link-building/why-rewriting-the-same-article-over-over-again-is-a-waste-of-time/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pokerseo.org/blog/poker-link-building/why-rewriting-the-same-article-over-over-again-is-a-waste-of-time/</link>
	<description>Poker SEO &#38; Link Building Strategy, Tactics and Techniques</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2010 19:58:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: pokerextras</title>
		<link>http://www.pokerseo.org/blog/poker-link-building/why-rewriting-the-same-article-over-over-again-is-a-waste-of-time/comment-page-1/#comment-969</link>
		<dc:creator>pokerextras</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 22:45:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pokerseo.org/blog/?p=47#comment-969</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m confused by this article and your reasoning behind it. Surely, if your only reason for posting articles is to get links, then submitting the article to the best directories, then spinning it and submitting the spun versions to other directories will be much better for your ranking than not spinning it and submitting the new versions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m confused by this article and your reasoning behind it. Surely, if your only reason for posting articles is to get links, then submitting the article to the best directories, then spinning it and submitting the spun versions to other directories will be much better for your ranking than not spinning it and submitting the new versions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SEO Is Work - Online Poker SEO</title>
		<link>http://www.pokerseo.org/blog/poker-link-building/why-rewriting-the-same-article-over-over-again-is-a-waste-of-time/comment-page-1/#comment-52</link>
		<dc:creator>SEO Is Work - Online Poker SEO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 21:36:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pokerseo.org/blog/?p=47#comment-52</guid>
		<description>[...] Ray recently posted another great articles on his SEO Blog about Wasting Time getting Crappy links when you could be spending your time getting quality natural links with good content. This is a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Ray recently posted another great articles on his SEO Blog about Wasting Time getting Crappy links when you could be spending your time getting quality natural links with good content. This is a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ridge</title>
		<link>http://www.pokerseo.org/blog/poker-link-building/why-rewriting-the-same-article-over-over-again-is-a-waste-of-time/comment-page-1/#comment-51</link>
		<dc:creator>Ridge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 17:27:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pokerseo.org/blog/?p=47#comment-51</guid>
		<description>Ah great article Randy. There is a huge movement on social network linking and people seem to really think this is a brilliant SEO strategy instead of doing REAL on page SEO work or writing quality content. Links are great, social network sites have their place, but long term webmasters need to do real work on their sites and not spend 12 hours a day finding a do follow directory to get a link from.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah great article Randy. There is a huge movement on social network linking and people seem to really think this is a brilliant SEO strategy instead of doing REAL on page SEO work or writing quality content. Links are great, social network sites have their place, but long term webmasters need to do real work on their sites and not spend 12 hours a day finding a do follow directory to get a link from.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Woods</title>
		<link>http://www.pokerseo.org/blog/poker-link-building/why-rewriting-the-same-article-over-over-again-is-a-waste-of-time/comment-page-1/#comment-31</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Woods</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 14:36:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pokerseo.org/blog/?p=47#comment-31</guid>
		<description>Thanks Randy.  Thanks for the idea with the starting a poker directory.  I will look into that.  Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Randy.  Thanks for the idea with the starting a poker directory.  I will look into that.  Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.pokerseo.org/blog/poker-link-building/why-rewriting-the-same-article-over-over-again-is-a-waste-of-time/comment-page-1/#comment-29</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 10:58:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pokerseo.org/blog/?p=47#comment-29</guid>
		<description>Hey Randy

Do you do requests here? Thought of some poker SEO questions that might also make great blog posts... apologies if these seem too obvious / banal!

 - Outbound linking to authority sites to improve rankings, does this work? read something about using your keywords in outbound anchor texts from your homepage improving rankings... any thoughts on this too?? Of course why would you NOT want to link to authority sites, as this adds value for your readers.

 - Internal Structures... how to best organize your site to make use of your internal &#039;link juice&#039; while at the same time making it easy for your visitors to get around. Assuming that the goal is to both improve high-level keyword rankings and keep yourself visible for the long tail.

Anyway - just some ideas!

Cheers, Mark</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Randy</p>
<p>Do you do requests here? Thought of some poker SEO questions that might also make great blog posts&#8230; apologies if these seem too obvious / banal!</p>
<p> &#8211; Outbound linking to authority sites to improve rankings, does this work? read something about using your keywords in outbound anchor texts from your homepage improving rankings&#8230; any thoughts on this too?? Of course why would you NOT want to link to authority sites, as this adds value for your readers.</p>
<p> &#8211; Internal Structures&#8230; how to best organize your site to make use of your internal &#8216;link juice&#8217; while at the same time making it easy for your visitors to get around. Assuming that the goal is to both improve high-level keyword rankings and keep yourself visible for the long tail.</p>
<p>Anyway &#8211; just some ideas!</p>
<p>Cheers, Mark</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.pokerseo.org/blog/poker-link-building/why-rewriting-the-same-article-over-over-again-is-a-waste-of-time/comment-page-1/#comment-27</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 03:35:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pokerseo.org/blog/?p=47#comment-27</guid>
		<description>IMO, the main thing is to avoid hiring someone on a forum who offers to submit your site to 1000 directories for you for $29.95. But if you&#039;re looking for some specific suggestions, DMOZ and Yahoo are great IF you can get listed. BOTW is a great directory too. JoeAnt and GoGuides are both okay.

One good strategy would be to launch your own niche directory too. Then you could link to your site from your directory. As far as I know, no one has done a good job of creating a Yahoo type poker directory yet. You could be the first and really kick ass.

Hope that helps.

Randy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IMO, the main thing is to avoid hiring someone on a forum who offers to submit your site to 1000 directories for you for $29.95. But if you&#8217;re looking for some specific suggestions, DMOZ and Yahoo are great IF you can get listed. BOTW is a great directory too. JoeAnt and GoGuides are both okay.</p>
<p>One good strategy would be to launch your own niche directory too. Then you could link to your site from your directory. As far as I know, no one has done a good job of creating a Yahoo type poker directory yet. You could be the first and really kick ass.</p>
<p>Hope that helps.</p>
<p>Randy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Woods</title>
		<link>http://www.pokerseo.org/blog/poker-link-building/why-rewriting-the-same-article-over-over-again-is-a-waste-of-time/comment-page-1/#comment-25</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Woods</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 21:01:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pokerseo.org/blog/?p=47#comment-25</guid>
		<description>Hi Randy,

How would someone with a new site pick directories to submit to?  I know that I can look at the quality of the sites that are on the directory.  Also are there that many good free directories or will I be looking at mostly paid directories?

Thanks,

Chris</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Randy,</p>
<p>How would someone with a new site pick directories to submit to?  I know that I can look at the quality of the sites that are on the directory.  Also are there that many good free directories or will I be looking at mostly paid directories?</p>
<p>Thanks,</p>
<p>Chris</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
